<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Thoughts on the VCE Announcement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thevirtualblackhole.com/virtual-tech/my-thoughts-on-the-vce-announcement/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thevirtualblackhole.com/virtual-tech/my-thoughts-on-the-vce-announcement</link>
	<description>The Virtual Black Hole</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: RTFM Education &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Virtual Compute Environment - VMware, Cisco and EMC Coalition</title>
		<link>http://www.thevirtualblackhole.com/virtual-tech/my-thoughts-on-the-vce-announcement#comment-6523</link>
		<dc:creator>RTFM Education &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Virtual Compute Environment - VMware, Cisco and EMC Coalition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevirtualblackhole.com/?p=805#comment-6523</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.thevirtualblackhole.com/virtual-tech/my-thoughts-on-the-vce-announcement [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.thevirtualblackhole.com/virtual-tech/my-thoughts-on-the-vce-announcement" rel="nofollow">http://www.thevirtualblackhole.com/virtual-tech/my-thoughts-on-the-vce-announcement</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Trackbacks for Virtual Black Hole » Blog Archive » My Thoughts on the VCE Announcement [thevirtualblackhole.com] on Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.thevirtualblackhole.com/virtual-tech/my-thoughts-on-the-vce-announcement#comment-6503</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Trackbacks for Virtual Black Hole » Blog Archive » My Thoughts on the VCE Announcement [thevirtualblackhole.com] on Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevirtualblackhole.com/?p=805#comment-6503</guid>
		<description>[...] Virtual Black Hole » Blog Archive » My Thoughts on the VCE Announcement  www.thevirtualblackhole.com/virtual-tech/my-thoughts-on-the-vce-announcement &#8211; view page &#8211; cached  It seems the big news for the day is the Announcement of the VCE Coalition. Seems I have been reading blog posts about this all morning with the last post being Scott Lowe’s thoughts on the... Read moreIt seems the big news for the day is the Announcement of the VCE Coalition. Seems I have been reading blog posts about this all morning with the last post being Scott Lowe’s thoughts on the subject. I have been hearing that this has been in the works for a while now and yes it will be nice to be able to use one SKU to some sort of complete hardware package for running your virtual infrastructure. I do, however have to agree with Scott Lowe that VMware has the most risk from this adventure but I really have to ask the question. Where you really expecting anything different? Let’s take a look at the money angle. EMC owns VMware and CISCO has invested a lot of money into VMware also, at least in my mind, it was just a matter of time for something like this to happen. Well than again there was my favorite rumor that CISCO was going to buy VMware or even better yet EMC. Read less [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Virtual Black Hole » Blog Archive » My Thoughts on the VCE Announcement  <a href="http://www.thevirtualblackhole.com/virtual-tech/my-thoughts-on-the-vce-announcement" rel="nofollow">http://www.thevirtualblackhole.com/virtual-tech/my-thoughts-on-the-vce-announcement</a> &ndash; view page &ndash; cached  It seems the big news for the day is the Announcement of the VCE Coalition. Seems I have been reading blog posts about this all morning with the last post being Scott Lowe’s thoughts on the&#8230; Read moreIt seems the big news for the day is the Announcement of the VCE Coalition. Seems I have been reading blog posts about this all morning with the last post being Scott Lowe’s thoughts on the subject. I have been hearing that this has been in the works for a while now and yes it will be nice to be able to use one SKU to some sort of complete hardware package for running your virtual infrastructure. I do, however have to agree with Scott Lowe that VMware has the most risk from this adventure but I really have to ask the question. Where you really expecting anything different? Let’s take a look at the money angle. EMC owns VMware and CISCO has invested a lot of money into VMware also, at least in my mind, it was just a matter of time for something like this to happen. Well than again there was my favorite rumor that CISCO was going to buy VMware or even better yet EMC. Read less [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.thevirtualblackhole.com/virtual-tech/my-thoughts-on-the-vce-announcement#comment-6497</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 04:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevirtualblackhole.com/?p=805#comment-6497</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by sbeaver: New Blog Post: My Thoughts on the VCE Announcement -- http://bit.ly/vwS6o...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by sbeaver: New Blog Post: My Thoughts on the VCE Announcement &#8212; <a href="http://bit.ly/vwS6o.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/vwS6o..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.thevirtualblackhole.com/virtual-tech/my-thoughts-on-the-vce-announcement#comment-6493</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevirtualblackhole.com/?p=805#comment-6493</guid>
		<description>I agree with your comments.  I blogged the same viewpoint today.  This announcement is nothing but marketing hype.  There's no new product - just an idea of "hey let's put all of our stuff together" and put a big red bow on it.  Wake me up when there's a real announcement...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your comments.  I blogged the same viewpoint today.  This announcement is nothing but marketing hype.  There&#8217;s no new product - just an idea of &#8220;hey let&#8217;s put all of our stuff together&#8221; and put a big red bow on it.  Wake me up when there&#8217;s a real announcement&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fridge</title>
		<link>http://www.thevirtualblackhole.com/virtual-tech/my-thoughts-on-the-vce-announcement#comment-6492</link>
		<dc:creator>Fridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevirtualblackhole.com/?p=805#comment-6492</guid>
		<description>Steve,
I have to agree that unless you have been under a rock lately, could you really be surprised by this?  Just look at this past year:  vSphere, PowerPath/VE, SRM (tighter integration with EMC storage out of the chute), Nexus 1000v, UCS (obviously built looking at virtualization).  There was clearly a strong synergy between the 3 companies that was only growing stronger.
Rod</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,<br />
I have to agree that unless you have been under a rock lately, could you really be surprised by this?  Just look at this past year:  vSphere, PowerPath/VE, SRM (tighter integration with EMC storage out of the chute), Nexus 1000v, UCS (obviously built looking at virtualization).  There was clearly a strong synergy between the 3 companies that was only growing stronger.<br />
Rod</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
