The March 2, 2009 issue of Fortune magazine got me thinking about the various types of cloud computing. Prior to reading it, I thought of the Cloud much as VMware describes it; an on-demand computing resource that can be transparently used when needed. However, Forture defined the Cloud as “centralized computing services that are delivered over the internet.” I have always thought of this model as Software as a Service (SaaS), and I am not sure I agree with the “centralized” part. Fortune mentioned salesforce.com as an example of a company leveraging cloud computing. Another article in the same issue described how Kenworth trucks “took advantage of cloud computing” because they rented time on a supercomputer thousands of mile away. Finally, a sidebar article implied that cloud computing is “applications housed remotely and delivered via the net.
When I first read the articles I thought, “Fortune doesn’t get it. That isn’t cloud computing.” Upon further reflection I wondered if maybe my definition is too restrictive. Maybe cloud computing is a category that includes multiple types of computing, including SaaS. I wonder if it is time for someone to define a cloud computing taxonomy.
Previous Post
Reflections After VMworld
Next Post
Update from Steve’s Virtual Place
This entry was posted on Wednesday, March 4th, 2009 at 3:43 am and is filed under Virtual Product Management. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.







March 4th, 2009 3:29 pm
Have you seen Chris Hoff’s blog post on this exact thing:
http://rationalsecurity.typepad.com/blog/2009/01/cloud-computing-taxonomy-ontology-please-review.html
Virgil
March 15th, 2009 10:41 pm
Of course we couldn’t call it ASP or SaaS anymore. That would be so passe